Presidential Election Campaigns and American Democracy: The Relationship Between Communication Use and Normative Outcomes
Loading...
Date
Authors
Michael Pfau
J. Brian Houston
Shane M. Semmler
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Behavioral Scientist
B
Data Nutrition Label85/100
- Completeness88
- Licensing100
- Openness100
- Provenance50
Assessed Jul 1, 2026
Abstract
There is very little research about the relative influence of campaign communication forms or venues on normative outcomes concerning the extent to which campaign communication promotes or degrades basic democratic values. This investigation assesses the relative impact of 17 communication forms on three normative outcomes: political expertise, which embodies people’s awareness, knowledge, and interest in politics; attitude about the process used to elect candidates; and likelihood of participating in the political process. Data are based on results of two national surveys conducted in different phases of the 2004 presidential campaign. Hierarchical regression analyses are used to evaluate the relative influence of the 17 communication forms on normative outcomes, controlling for sociodemographic variables.
Description
Citation
Pfau, M., Houston, J. B., & Semmler, S. M. (2005). Presidential Election Campaigns and American Democracy: The Relationship Between Communication Use and Normative Outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(1), 48-62. doi: 10.1177/0002764205279429
Related file
Notes
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Collection Detail
# of Isolates from RBM
# of Isolates from TV8
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States
